PS2 backwards compatibility not coming back to PS3, ever
Section: Gaming News, Consoles, PS2, PS3
Kiddies, you may want to sit down for this one. I have some bad news.
During a chat with ArsTechnica, Sony Computer Entertainment of America’s marketing director, John Koller, the longtime question of what Sony plans to do about PlayStation 2 backwards compatibility on PlayStation 3 was asked and met with a disturbing answer:
“It’s not coming back, so let me put that on the table,” Koller says…
“It’s not as big as a purchase intent driver as you may be hearing,” he claimed. “We’ve got such a substantial lineup of titles on the PS3; most people are buying the PS3 for PS3 games. They’re buying it for PS3 games and Blu-ray movies.
“That won’t be returning.”
Sadly, I’m inclined to think Sony is meaning it this time around. The newly introduced PS3 Slim is apparently going to be the future of the PlayStation 3 according to Mr. Koller in the same interview, this means all the features the Slim has and doesn’t have are all we will be getting, probably until Sony introduces the PlayStation 4. A major bummer considering that PS2 backwards compatibility is one of the things that pushed me into purchasing the once $600 console, especially since the patch released upscaling PS2 games.
This news doesn’t mean that Sony couldn’t bring PS2 games to the PlayStation Store ala the PSOne games it currently provides but then you have to wonder, what are they waiting for?
According to the July 2009 NPD numbers, the PlayStation 2 was the lowest selling of the three Sony systems, the second time in two consecutive months the system has fallen behind (it was also last in June). If Sony was waiting for consumers sales of the PlayStation 2 to slow down before they bring back PS2 and PS3 integration, now would seem to be the time to make their move.
As for the quote about consumers buying the PS3 for PS3 games, has Sony really given said consumers a choice in the last couple of years (60GB models were discontinued in 2007)?
Alright readers, sound off in the comment section below.
Read [ArsTechnica] Also Read [1UP] Also Read [Shacknews] Also Read [JoystickRadio]
Full Story ? | Written by Kris Rosado for Gamertell. | Comment on this Article ?









Honestly? This announcement makes me want to skip buying the PS3 entirely. None of the PS3 games released really interest me, and there’s a whole backlog of PS2 games I want to play, but don’t have a console to do so on. There’s no point in me shelling out $500 for a system that won’t play the games I want to play. That’s why the PS2 is still selling better than the PS3. Or do they not pay attention to their own sales statistics?
you obviously dont know what ur talking about. for starters it only $300, and if you want to play ps 2 games soo bad, then buy a ps 2. duh…
Next, you obviously have never tried to market something. the ps3 ur thinking about that costs $600 only cost that much cuz of th BC…. that software is expensive and was expensive to put in the ps3 along with blueray… and sales dont matter if ur not turning a profit.